Follow us: Follow-Us-On-Bluesky

Welcome to WiseBison

@aaronhilton
Contributed on Feb 10, 2025
Welcome to WiseBison
TL;DR

Social media has revolutionized communication and information dissemination, fostering a platform where individuals can share their opinions and ideas freely. However, this freedom has also led to the proliferation of uneducated opinions, often devoid of thorough research and understanding. This article explores the phenomenon of uninformed opinions on social media and emphasizes the need for social knowledge platforms to facilitate the sharing of accurate information and knowledge beyond traditional educational settings.

Contribution Knowledge

The advent of social media has transformed the way people communicate, access information, and share their opinions. Platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram have provided individuals with the means to express their thoughts on various topics instantaneously. While this democratization of expression has its merits, it has also resulted in the widespread dissemination of uneducated opinions. This article aims to examine the factors contributing to this trend and propose social knowledge platforms as a solution to promote informed discourse.

The Rise of Uninformed Opinions on Social Media

Social media's accessibility and ease of use have empowered individuals to voice their opinions on a wide range of subjects. However, several factors contribute to the prevalence of uneducated opinions:

Lack of Research: The instantaneous nature of social media encourages users to share their thoughts without conducting thorough research. The pressure to participate in ongoing discussions can lead to the dissemination of inaccurate or incomplete information (Tufekci, 2017).

Echo Chambers: Social media algorithms often create echo chambers, where users are exposed to information that aligns with their existing beliefs. This reinforcement of pre-existing views can discourage critical thinking and promote the spread of uninformed opinions (Sunstein, 2001).

Viral Content: The viral nature of social media prioritizes sensational and emotionally charged content over factual accuracy. As a result, opinions based on incomplete or misleading information can gain traction and influence public discourse (Vosoughi, Roy, & Aral, 2018).

Anonymity: The anonymity afforded by social media allows individuals to express opinions without accountability. This can lead to the spread of uneducated and even harmful views without fear of repercussions (Suler, 2004).

Types of Knowledge and Their Role in Decision-Making

Types of knowledge can be broadly categorized into explicit and tacit knowledge, both of which play crucial roles in sharing information and making decisions. Explicit knowledge refers to formal, codified information that is easily communicated and shared through written documents, databases, and other media. Examples of explicit knowledge include textbooks, research papers, and online articles. This type of knowledge is essential for providing a foundational understanding of various subjects and can be easily accessed and referenced by individuals seeking information (Oeberst, Kimmerle, & Cress, 2016).

On the other hand, tacit knowledge is personal, context-specific, and often difficult to formalize and communicate. It includes insights, intuitions, and experiences that individuals acquire over time. Tacit knowledge is typically shared through personal interactions, mentorship, and hands-on experiences, playing a crucial role in decision-making by allowing individuals to draw on their accumulated wisdom and expertise to make informed judgments (Oeberst, Kimmerle, & Cress, 2016).

The Need for Social Knowledge Platforms

To counter the spread of uneducated opinions, there is a growing need for social knowledge platforms. These platforms facilitate the sharing of accurate information and foster informed discourse outside traditional educational settings. Here are several reasons why social knowledge platforms are essential:

Accessibility: Social knowledge platforms provide access to reliable information and expert insights, democratizing knowledge beyond academic institutions. This ensures that individuals from diverse backgrounds can engage in informed discussions (Rainie & Wellman, 2012).

Verification: These platforms often have mechanisms in place to verify the accuracy of information shared. Peer reviews, citations, and fact-checking processes help maintain the integrity of the content (Schmidt, 2019).

Community Engagement: Social knowledge platforms foster communities of like-minded individuals who value informed discourse. These communities can collaboratively explore topics, share insights, and challenge uneducated opinions with evidence-based arguments (Etzioni & Etzioni, 2017).

Lifelong Learning: By offering a space for continuous learning, social knowledge platforms encourage individuals to expand their understanding of various subjects. This promotes a culture of curiosity and critical thinking, counteracting the trend of superficial opinions (Jarche, 2013).

Bridging Gaps: These platforms bridge the gap between academic knowledge and public understanding. They make complex information more accessible and comprehensible, enabling individuals to make informed decisions and contribute meaningfully to discussions (Benkler, 2006).

Social knowledge platforms are highly effective in facilitating the sharing of both explicit and tacit knowledge. These platforms provide a repository of reliable information, research articles, and expert insights that can be easily accessed by users. This helps individuals build a solid knowledge base and make informed decisions based on accurate information (Benkler, 2006). Additionally, social knowledge platforms foster communities where individuals can engage in discussions, share personal experiences, and mentor one another. The exchange of tacit knowledge on these platforms enriches the decision-making process by incorporating diverse perspectives and real-world insights (Etzioni & Etzioni, 2017).

Conclusion

While social media has empowered individuals to express their opinions freely, it has also led to the proliferation of uneducated opinions. The need for social knowledge platforms is evident, as they provide a structured environment for the dissemination of accurate information and informed discourse. By fostering communities of lifelong learners and promoting critical thinking, these platforms can counteract the spread of uninformed opinions and contribute to a more knowledgeable and engaged society.

Citations
  • Oeberst, Aileen & Kimmerle, Joachim & Cress, Ulrike. (2016). What Is Knowledge? Who Creates It? Who Possesses It? The Need for Novel Answers to Old Questions. 10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_6.
  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.
  • Etzioni, A., & Etzioni, O. (2017). Communal Knowledge Platforms. Communications of the ACM, 60(12), 26-28.
  • Jarche, H. (2013). Seek > Sense > Share. Retrieved from https://jarche.com/2013/04/seek-sense-share/
  • Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The New Social Operating System. MIT Press.
  • Schmidt, C. (2019). Toward a Verified Internet. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, 38(2), 73-78.
  • Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Echo Chambers: Bush v. Gore, Impeachment, and Beyond. Princeton University Press.
  • Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.
  • Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.
Discussions

Have more to contribute to this topic? Create a response contribution

@michael
Feb 26, 2025 3:36 PM

Thanks for putting your effort into this endeavor, Aaron! I appreciate your efforts, and look forward to seeing what can be built!

@sasteber
Feb 26, 2025 3:36 PM

Happy to be among the first.

Can’t wait to see where the goes.